![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
|
|
![]() |
|
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Dr. Toshihiro Ogawa
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION
![]() 2. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTIONS
![]() 3. INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESPONDING TO NASDA RESEARCH ANNOUNCEMENT3.1 Proposal ContentsInvestigators responding to this research announcement must provide the information below to NASDA for evaluation. Further detailed information and the forms are provided in section 4. 3.2 SelectionSelection decisions will be made following peer and/or scientific review of the proposals. A peer review will be carried out by selected external discipline specialists in the area of the proposal. A selection committee will then be assembled in NASDA and will evaluate the proposals. The final decisions are made by a NASDA selecting official. The principal elements considered in evaluating a proposal are its relevance to the objectives, intrinsic merit and cost. Evaluation of its intrinsic merit includes consideration of the following equally important factors. 3.3 ResourcesNASDA will reserve funds to support selected proposals conducted by Principal Investigators (PIs) whose home institutions are in Japan, subject to availability of funds. 3.4 Relationship to AwardA contract, cooperative agreement or other agreement may be applied to accomplish selected proposals. 3.5 Report to NASDAPI has an obligation to report both interim and final report to NASDA. 3.6 Utilization of ResultsResults derived from research activities shall generally be published.A PI who wishes to release his or her research results to a third party organization shall 3.7 Renewal ProposalsRenewal proposals for existing awards will be considered in the same manner as proposals for new endeavors. A renewal proposal should not repeat all of the information that was in the original proposal. The renewal proposal should refer to its predecessor, update the parts that are no longer current, and indicate what elements of the research are expected to be covered during the period for which support is desired. Significant findings since the most recent progress report should also be described. The renewal proposal should treat, in reasonable detail, the plans for the next period, contain a cost estimate, and otherwise adhere to these instructions. 3.8 Late ProposalsA proposal or modification received after the date specified in this RA may be considered if the selecting official deems it to offer NASDA a significant scientific and/or technical advantage or cost reduction. 3.9 LengthProposals should be as brief as possible and concentrate on substantive material. Proposals should not exceed 20 pages in length. Necessary detailed information, such as reprints, should be included as attachments. A complete set of attachments is necessary for each copy of the proposal. 3.10 Schedule
![]() 4. INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPOSAL CONTENTS4.1 LanguageProposals shall be written in English. 4.2 Proposal Cover SheetPlease fill out Form 1 according to the following instructions. 4.3 AbstractInclude a concise, one-page abstract describing the objective and the method of approach. 4.4 Project Descriptions
4.5 Management ApproachFor large or complex efforts involving interactions among numerous individuals or other organizations, plans for distribution of responsibilities and arrangements for ensuring a coordinated effort should be described. 4.6 PersonnelThe principal investigator is responsible for supervising of the work and participates in the research. A short biographical sketch of the principal investigator as well as a list of principal publications and any exceptional qualifications should be included. Give similar biographical information for other senior professional personnel who will be directly associated with the project. 4.7 Resource RequirementsInformation of required resources will be considered during the selection process. After deciding the total amount of funding for each PI, NASDA will send more detailed forms for resource requirements to selected PIs. Before beginning the second and third years, NASDA will send the same forms for resource requirements again. ![]() 5. LETTER OF INTENTAll prospective proposers are strongly encouraged to submit a letter of intent in response to this announcement. This will allow us to alert a peer review staff to adequately cover the proposal review process. ![]() Form
![]() Download File
![]() ![]() |